In love with our
things we can see, and things we cannot see but can nevertheless understand.
The capability to understand the unseen is one of the aspects that defines our
One of the
things that we can understand, which no eye has ever seen, are the paradoxes of
the orbits of our planet.
paradoxes? Doesn't everybody know that the planets are held in their orbit by
the centrifugal force of their orbit that is balanced against the force of the
gravity that the mass of the Sun exerts onto the mass of the planets? The
gravitational force is one of the basic forces of the universe. It is a force
of attraction between bodies of mass. It is believed that the Sun contains
99.86% of the total mass of the solar system. The gravitational force of its
mass is so great that it by itself, essentially, determines the gravitational
attraction that gives it a hold onto the planets. The Sun's surface gravity is
28 times greater than that of the earth.
Now, with all this
enormous attraction exerted onto the planets, the planets do not fall into the Sun, because the kinetic energy of the planets resists
the gravity-imposed directional change. The effect creates the so-called centrifugal force that counteracts and
balances the Sun's attraction.
the orbits remain stable, because the gravitational force diminishes with the
square of the distance of an orbiting planet from the Sun, while the centrifugal force
diminishes with the cube of the distance. This difference creates stable
For example, if a
head-on collision with an
asteroid would occur, the energy of the impact would minutely 'slow' the
impacted planet. The impact would reduce its kinetic energy. As the consequence, the planet would be more
strongly attracted by the sun. Its orbit would decay thereby. However, the planet would not fall into the Sun, because the
resulting lower orbit would increase the planet's speed, and by the greater
curvature of the orbit, would give it
a stronger centrifugal force. By this interplay, a new stable orbit would
result, in which the planet would remain safe.
this is fairly common knowledge. It is routinely used to calculate spaceflight
trajectories. The paradox begins when it comes to understanding why all the
planets in the solar system orbit on essentially the same plane, within a few
degrees, and orbit all in the same direction. No mechanistic cause is possible
that makes sense, for this to happen. Still, this is precisely what we see
happening. Why don't we see planets in polar orbits around the Sun, for
example, or at any inclination? Also, why don't some planets orbit in opposite
directions? From a mechanistic standpoint all imaginable orbits are possible.
But why don't they happen?
theories have been invented to explain this paradox, which cannot really be
explained from a mechanistic standpoint, but is rather simple from the
electrodynamics standpoint. The electrodynamics theory is based on the Primer
Fields. The Primer Fields are electromagnetic fields that form in space by
flowing currents of plasma, primarily protons and electrons, the particles
that atoms are made of, which carry an electric charge and produce magnetic
fields by their motion.
Primer Fields - Part 1
Primer Fields - Part 2
Primer Fields - Part 3)
plasma streams typically become self-confined by the Lorentz force to ever
tighter confinement, the closer they get to a potential sink. At the tightest
confinement the fields converge into 'knots' of high density plasma, like the
one that surrounds the Sun of our solar system. From the tight confinement the
magnetic fields loop back together with some of the plasma. Since the Sun
doesn't consume all of the plasma, the interstellar plasma stream flows on and
expands again, flowing away from the Sun, creating complimentary magnetic
fields with the opposite polarity. The magnetic fields cause objects
between the fields to rotate around the center within an
electromagnetically-confined ecliptic plane (shown
in yellow). Within this ecliptic plane the
planets of our solar system were born and remain located there. The planets
that orbit on this plane are the products of atomic
elements synthesized in the nuclear fusion processes that occur on the surface of the
Sun (deep within the green sphere, the high-density plasma sphere).
(see my video: Our
Electric Fusion Sun
Since the above two primer
fields (above) are formed with opposite magnetic polarity, a larger magnetic
field develops from pole to pole that encapsulates both of the above fields
for a larger image
The resulting larger
sphere (purple) may provide the magnetic background that enabled the
heliosphere to form at a distance of roughly 100 AU (100 times the distance of
the Earth from the Sun (1 AU =
150,000,000 km; or 93,000,000 mi). The orbit of the farthest planet (Neptune
at 30.1 AU) extends to roughly a third
of the way to the edge of the heliosphere. The edge of the heliosphere is also
where the solar winds come to a halt, which is therefore termed the heliopause.
The atomic elements that are synthesized by the Sun by fusing plasma into
atoms will likely be captured by the planets long before they reach the edge
of the heliosphere. The heliosphere is understood to be a sphere of plasma
for a larger image
solar nuclear fusion process on the surface of the Sun has created essentially
all the atoms for the planets is evident by the recognition that the surface
of the Sun contains a closely-similar ratio of the major elements to the
ration that has been
recognized spectroscopically as the cosmic abundance ratio of elements in our Galaxy.
This ratio would not exist at the surface of the Sun if it was not generated
there. When plasma is fused into atoms, its electric properties become
neutralized. In electromagnetic terms, the plasma no longer exists. By this process,
Sun becomes a plasma sink, and with it the creator of its planets.
The so-created atomic elements,
then flow away from the Sun with the solar wind
and condense into planets. To some degree, this process is still ongoing. The heavy elements condense first and form the
inner planets, while hydrogen and helium form the outer planets.
geometric progression of the spacing of the planets, which Johannes Kepler in
the 1600s had found remarkably similar to a musical scale, is evidently caused
by a basic, natural, electric
geometric progression that we observe in comparing the orbits, corresponds to
the principle of the spacing of node-points in the plasma of the heliospheric
current sheet that extends from the Sun and is aligned with the ecliptic. As the
plasma current in the heliospheric current
sheet flows away from the Sun, it flows through geometrically expanding areas
of space, which increases the distance correspondingly between the node-points
of the plasma current. Plato does not match the general characteristic of
the planets. It is therefore considered a space opbject 'captuted' by the
(See table of planetary data)
geometric progression of the spacing of the orbits of the planets tells us that the planets were formed in their
respective orbital paths, determined by the respective node points. It also
tells us that to some degree the orbits are actively maintained there. The highly
circular shape of the orbits of the planets, suggests that the orbits are
likely, at least to some degree, actively maintained by electromagnetic
action. Evidence that this may be so can be found in ice core samples drilled
from the ice sheets in Antarctica.
for a larger image
core samples tell us that dust accumulation in ice has increased roughly
20-fold near the end of the last Ice Age, beginning roughly 70,000 years ago.
The same type of pattern can also be recognized for the earlier ice ages,
though less pronounced. The sudden increase in ice accumulation could have had
several causes. It could have been, that the increased ice accumulation on the
continents had caused stress effects that led to increased volcanic action.
timeframe, though almost rules this out. It is more likely that the vast
increase of dust in the air has resulted from dramatically increased meteorite
intrusions into the the Earth's atmosphere. During an ice age, when the primer
fields do not exist for long periods, their active support of the orbiting
system no longer exists either. In addition, the gravity of the Sun would be
lower during its inactive period. When the present external plasma pressure on
the Sun is removed, the internal plasma pressure will become balanced by increased
solar mass-ejections, which affects its effective gravity. All of these
effects affect the orbiting objects, from asteroids to the planets. Asteroids
typically disintegrate in the atmosphere, adding to its dustiness. The ice
core samples tell us that the dustiness suddenly ends when the Sun goes active
again and re-asserts its effect on the orbital system as the interglacial
period begins. This is evident in all the previous ice ages, for which ice
this analysis tell us?
evidence tells us that we can expect to see increased earthquake activity. We
are in the transition zone towards the next Ice Age that could potentially
begin in 30 years with the Sun going inactive at this time. NASA's Ulysses
spacecraft had measured a 30% reduction in solar-wind pressure in 10 years,
before the mission was terminated in 2009. In the wake of this weakening a
large increase in earthquakes has occurred.
for a larger image
type of weakening still ongoing, the solar mass-ejections will likely
increase, especially during the down slope of the solar activity cycles when
the Sun adjusts itself to lower external plasma pressure, as is shown in the
increase of the number of earthquakes registered in the USA during the down
slope of solar cycle 23.
for a larger image
principle that we see coming to light here has a direct bearing on western Canada
and the USA. As the solar system becomes electrically weaker, the solar mass
ejections will increase, and with it the earthquakes that result from the Earth absorbing
some of the ejected plasma mass that causes electric stress in the Earth's surface
Much more of that will happen when the Sun goes inactive
altogether as the Ice Age begins. Canada will then be severely affected by the
resulting shock effect. The Cascadia
Subduction Zone on Canada's West Coast has seen little earthquake activity since 1700.
Evidently great tectonic stress has been built up in this zone.
is that this zone may rumble in a big way at the time the next Ice Age begins
when large population movement will likely become necessary. The transition
time may also coincide with potential asteroid activity, especially by the
space objects that are already near or in Earth's orbital space, and those may
have some large effects in addition to all the other challenges.
numerous potential effects tell us that long-term Ice Age Transition Planning
will be required from now on, which is presently not even considered for the
lack of recognition of the electric ice age dynamics. Fortunately this
'blindness' and corresponding inaction can be reversed when sufficient
interest develops. It is possible to redirect the focus away from war,
economic looting, imperial domination, and the depopulation policies of the
coveted 'new' world order, and to instead focus our creative energies onto the
strategic defence of mankind against the New Ice Age on our doorstep and its
consequences. All the man-made dangers, from nuclear war to economic
destruction, can all be eradicated in a week once society cares to do so. For
example, it is known were all the nuclear bombs are located. It is not a huge
task physically to disable them all, whereby the threat of an extinction-war
becomes history. In comparison, meeting the Ice Age Challenge is a formidable
task that will take decades to complete, and requires in the process the
creating of the greatest Renaissance of all times. While we are fully capable
of meeting all of these challenges, we have yet to commit ourselves to it. But
why would we want to tarry, before taking this step?
consider a gift contribution - Thank You
producer, and publisher